Colloque international "Location and Dislocation of Myth in the Colonial and Postcolonial Anglophone World"
Location and Dislocation of Myth in the Colonial and Postcolonial Anglophone World
Université Stendhal Grenoble 3
9-10-11 avril 2014
The research group on Modes of Representation in English studies, CEMRA EA 3016, from University Stendhal-Grenoble 3 is pleased to announce the organisation of an international conference on “Location and dislocation of myth in the colonial and postcolonial Anglophone world” to be held at University Stendhal on April 9, 10 and 11, 2014.
Drawing on the tension between the universality of myth and its cultural and territorial location, this conference proposes to examine the role played by antagonism, protest, insurrection, rebellion, conflict and war in the history of the English-speaking countries that have gone through both colonial and postcolonial experiences leading to forced migration, diaspora, displacement and exile. Be they the imperial, metropolitan centre or the resisting, local margin, territories are represented in tight connection with their supposed archaic origins. They have also often been defined by battles that were either lost or won by conquerors and gave rise to myths that aimed at strengthening identity and giving a purpose to an entire nation, even in the critical context of globalization. Alongside Mircea Eliades’ and Northrop Frye’s work, myths can be understood as narratives that best reflect the human endeavour to place oneself in the world and explain one’s nature and destiny in a bigger universe. Myth also creates and names territories, aiming to cement a community, a nation, and to hold the colony or country together.
Territories come in different forms and sizes, ranging from the distant and geographically isolated island to the apparently boundless territories of Canada, India or Australia. Focusing on the dynamics of mythic territories, through the examples of specific types of space (the island, the frontier territory, the metropolis), the conference will also survey the centrifugal and centripetal movements induced by the myths of inclusion or exclusion. Not only do national myths define territories, but they shape them into imaginary spaces and discourses involving resistance against the conquerors who wished to mould the colony into a mere replica of the homeland, thereby stripping its culture of its unique nature and language. As a result, social, ideological, political, philosophical and artistic conflicts have originated from the clash between those who are included in the national myth and those who are excluded from it. The crucial concept of the border that exists only to separate and therefore define territory can be the material representation of the mental divide that brings entire communities into conflict and ultimately to war.
Aucun document joint